The Cloud is the New Path to Open Source Monetization

To date there have been several ways to monetize open source projects:
- Don't. Just donate your time and code.
- Sugardaddy. Get a job at a big company that embeds your open source project in other products that make money.
- Services. Do consulting or training.
- "Pro" version. This is where most of the scalable open source businesses have gone like Red Hat, MySQL, JBoss, Spring, etc. This is typically some combination of support, packaging of bits, and enhanced features like the Red Hat or JBoss Network.

For those open source projects looking to expand, there was often frustration that only a few percent of the users who were all gaining value form the project would actually pay anything. This has limited growth. Look at RedHat being a $1B company and VMWare being a $2B+ (much younger) company. The reason is quite simple - there are free ways to get Red Hat's technology and you have to pay VMWare to get their technology.

Well, the Cloud has opened up a new avenue to monetize your open source project. When you offer your open source project as a hosted service, people are willing to pay you for that service. SauceLabs offering of Selenium is a great example of this.

This is one of the key strategies behind CloudBees. Not only are we offering a variety of open source projects like Jenkins, Maven and Git as cloud services, we are opening up our platform for other open source projects to also run in the Cloud.

Today, we announced our first open source cloud partner, Sonar. SonarSource is the company behind the leading open source project for doing code coverage analysis. The Cloud is a perfect deployment environment for this type of technology - where code analysis is done in bursts that may be quite resource intensive. So the pay-for-use model and no administrative and capital costs of the cloud is quite compelling.

CloudBees is greatly easing Sonar's transition to the Cloud. Our platform gives the project multi-tenancy and billing capabilities. In addition, many of our Jenkins-in-the-cloud users make use of Sonar and the integrated Sonar plug-in.

To be sure, the Cloud is not an instant path to monetization. Users have to migrate over according to their project schedules and hardware refresh cycles. For Jenkins, we have seen a powerful interest in Cloud deployment. Our customers April usage was double March (although still on relatively small numbers of about 1,500 users. However, if this growth continues over the next year it will produce a nice revenue stream - certainly int he neighborhood of the early JBoss days of selling training and documentation and a bit of phone support.

Here is a video demo.

We welcome other open source projects to engage with us. We have also just announced a free cloud development service for any open source project.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ringside Winding Down

A year ago, a group of us met in a pizza parlor to discuss how we could bring the social web to every website and business. In January, we launched Ringside Networks with seed funding from Matrix Partners, one of the best VC firms in the country. By the end of March we released into open source an initial beta of our Social Application Server – a very ambitious project. We got some very positive reviews on our approach, our implementation and the need in the marketplace for every website to become social. We were ready for our Series A round of funding, and in late May we received a number of term sheet offers from the very best VC firms. As we were about to finalize our funding, one of the biggest non-evil Internet companies asked if we would have interest in being acquired instead. After a lot of thought and debate, we decided that the larger company would enable us to get our technology to market sooner and with more impact. The story sounds almost too good to be true. And it w...
Read more

Capitalism vs. the Three Legged Stool

Image
Wikipedia defines: " Capitalism  is an  economic system  in which trade, industry and the  means of production  are controlled by private owners with the goal of making  profits  in a  market economy ." This definition has always bothered me. I prefer a different model where there is equal recognition of the three primary drivers behind the success of a company: Owners Employees Customers I like to think of it as a three legged stool, where each leg is as important as the other.  One gets too large or small and the stool tips over. The free market is supposed to take care of Employees and Customers.  Employees because the Owners will create so many jobs that due to supply and demand, employees will receive competitive pay.  Customers because if the owners are not building the right thing, then they can go elsewhere. As someone who has helped to build about 10 startup companies now, I have seen the power in mak...
Read more

Galbraith Revisited

Image
To follow up on my post from a while ago, Galbraith sited 5 key reasons for the 1929 crash and following depression: 1. The bad distribution of income. 2. The bad corporate structure. 3. The bad banking structure. 4. The dubious state of the foreign balance. 5. The poor state of economic intelligence. To compare this to today: 1. Bad income distribution. 1929 - Top 5% received about 33% of all personal income. 1929 - Top 1% held 44% of all wealth. 2000 - Top 1% received about 20% of all personal income. 2004 - Top 1% held 34% of all wealth. Here is a picture of the real income gains between 1979 and 2005 by percentage. It is clear that the top income groups are gaining ground faster than lower income groups - creating an income distribution that approaches 1929. 2. Bad corporate structure. In the 1929 era there had been a large rise in a "vast structure of holding companies and investment trusts... In particular the dividends from the operating companies paid the interest on t...
Read more