VMWare Exec makes my day

It was a really good day yesterday.  Very productive on lots of fronts, and a ton of good news for CloudBees.  We got in the Jolt Awards - "Cloudbees was included for special distinction because we strongly feel it indicates an important new direction in coding. The product is still in its infancy, but we think its importance to the market warrants inclusion for a special award." And we got named one of the 9 Hot Startups by NetworkWorld.


Then as I was getting ready for bed James Watters of VMWare posted this:

 James Watters 

@ 
 who in their right mind would take that troll blog by seriously? It doesn't even have its facts right around price

Well, a little tweet storm erupted that I will copy here for posterity purposes and ease of reading.  There are two blog posts in question: How Will PaaS be Priced, and Why VMWare Loves and Hates the Cloud.


 bobbickel 

I'm a troll!! So thrilling! Can't wait for those bridge tolls to come rolling in... Thanks 

 James Watters 

 I mean, I get it, start-ups should be scrappy and make noise, its cool, have fun.

 bobbickel 

 - my daughter just asked me if you called me a troll because I am short and ugly. I told it was complicated ;-)

 James Watters 

@ 
 but if your best troll is just making up pricing and not even looking at VSPP, its a pretty thin argument and you loose cred

 James Watters 

@ 
 I didn't call you a troll, I said your blog was a troll. And it was, look up the history of the word.

 bobbickel 

@ 
 - smile a bit. If my pricing is off, correct it in a comment. I tried my troll best to understand your pricing on VMware.com

 James Watters 

@ 
 its not my job to educate you about the market, enjoy your misconceptions, I just questions others using you as a reference.

 bobbickel 

Here are the two blogs in question - and

 James Watters 

@ 
 google: VSPP

 bobbickel 

I pulled the VMware pricing from  and

 Michael Neale 

@ 
 trolls do have beards.

This whole thread made me giggle.  


But to get serious:


1. This is my blog.  I do not seek approval from the companies I work with.  They are my thoughts as they pertain to the businesses I am involved in.


2. I am a homer (meaning I cheer for the home team).  So most of my blogs have to do with the businesses I am invested in and work with.  They recount the basic reasons that I am working with them beyond the fundamentals of wanting to hang with smart, hard working, fun, team-oriented people.  If that is a troll, then so be it.


3. I make sure that the information I write is accurate.  In spite of being a troll, I do value my credibility.  Although sometimes folks in big companies like Ted and James do not always agree.  As for the pricing in my blog it is based on single unit costs as explained on the VMWare TCServer Pricing and vSphere Pricing pages.  I do not get how James thinks a glorified volume discount program for Service  Providers makes my blog troll-like.


Making me feel a bit better about this was this tweet:
 Benjamin Dover 

  everyone is a troll according to so don't pay him no mind.

 Benjamin Dover 

 is much more accomplished then you  , he was on the board of  for crying out loud.
I am so happy a guy named Ben Dover came to rescue my credibility!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ringside Winding Down

A year ago, a group of us met in a pizza parlor to discuss how we could bring the social web to every website and business. In January, we launched Ringside Networks with seed funding from Matrix Partners, one of the best VC firms in the country. By the end of March we released into open source an initial beta of our Social Application Server – a very ambitious project. We got some very positive reviews on our approach, our implementation and the need in the marketplace for every website to become social. We were ready for our Series A round of funding, and in late May we received a number of term sheet offers from the very best VC firms. As we were about to finalize our funding, one of the biggest non-evil Internet companies asked if we would have interest in being acquired instead. After a lot of thought and debate, we decided that the larger company would enable us to get our technology to market sooner and with more impact. The story sounds almost too good to be true. And it w...
Read more

Capitalism vs. the Three Legged Stool

Image
Wikipedia defines: " Capitalism  is an  economic system  in which trade, industry and the  means of production  are controlled by private owners with the goal of making  profits  in a  market economy ." This definition has always bothered me. I prefer a different model where there is equal recognition of the three primary drivers behind the success of a company: Owners Employees Customers I like to think of it as a three legged stool, where each leg is as important as the other.  One gets too large or small and the stool tips over. The free market is supposed to take care of Employees and Customers.  Employees because the Owners will create so many jobs that due to supply and demand, employees will receive competitive pay.  Customers because if the owners are not building the right thing, then they can go elsewhere. As someone who has helped to build about 10 startup companies now, I have seen the power in mak...
Read more

Galbraith Revisited

Image
To follow up on my post from a while ago, Galbraith sited 5 key reasons for the 1929 crash and following depression: 1. The bad distribution of income. 2. The bad corporate structure. 3. The bad banking structure. 4. The dubious state of the foreign balance. 5. The poor state of economic intelligence. To compare this to today: 1. Bad income distribution. 1929 - Top 5% received about 33% of all personal income. 1929 - Top 1% held 44% of all wealth. 2000 - Top 1% received about 20% of all personal income. 2004 - Top 1% held 34% of all wealth. Here is a picture of the real income gains between 1979 and 2005 by percentage. It is clear that the top income groups are gaining ground faster than lower income groups - creating an income distribution that approaches 1929. 2. Bad corporate structure. In the 1929 era there had been a large rise in a "vast structure of holding companies and investment trusts... In particular the dividends from the operating companies paid the interest on t...
Read more