Social Networking for Every Web Site

Next week Ringside Networks will release a Social Application Server in free and open source that will allow any web site to take advantage of social networking.

I read this blog from Mark Brooks that says we may be on the right track.

“Consumers are sick and tired of being advertised at. Traditional advertising is dead. If you can't afford the time to have ambassadors and evangelists for your brand converse with your users directly through social networks, your brand will die.”

Ringside Networks is going to enable any web site to enhance their communications with their user base by creating and deploying social applications, and expand it beyond by allowing web sites to integrate with the large social networks like Facebook.

More coming on Tuesday, March 25th!

Comments

Howard Keziah said…
I think I understand what Ringside is doing and I like it. However, I don't understand how Ringside Networks intends to make money. That makes me hesitant to invest time using the product. I don't want to invest time and energy to later discover hidden costs that I'll incur for use.
April 22, 2008 at 10:17 AM
Bob said…
Good question. We intend to keep the platform totally open source with an LGPL license. We expect to add-on functionality and sell that in a subscription model. One of hte areas we will probably focus on is a set of analytical tools and applications that will help marketers understand and take action on the social graph. You could of course do this yourself because you own the data - so nothing that would prevent the open source intentions of this product. We did a similar startegy at JBoss, where the middleware was always open soruce, and we sold the management tools at a cost.

The other thing we will probably put into the production version we release at the end of June is a Payment Service. We will charge money for that - either as a fixed fee or a %. We should be able to do some interesting things with the social graph - like you could buy a subscription to some social application and pick say 10 of your firends that would also share that subscription. For example, a Family could share access to a game. Or a department in a company could share access to some social application that helped them collaborate.
April 22, 2008 at 10:28 AM
Howard Keziah said…
Thanks for the clarification.

Regarding the payment system, are you saying that you might be providing a payment system on our behalf? That you would collect a fee or % of what we charge? If so, that would be just a great benefit.
April 22, 2008 at 2:24 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ringside Winding Down

A year ago, a group of us met in a pizza parlor to discuss how we could bring the social web to every website and business. In January, we launched Ringside Networks with seed funding from Matrix Partners, one of the best VC firms in the country. By the end of March we released into open source an initial beta of our Social Application Server – a very ambitious project. We got some very positive reviews on our approach, our implementation and the need in the marketplace for every website to become social. We were ready for our Series A round of funding, and in late May we received a number of term sheet offers from the very best VC firms. As we were about to finalize our funding, one of the biggest non-evil Internet companies asked if we would have interest in being acquired instead. After a lot of thought and debate, we decided that the larger company would enable us to get our technology to market sooner and with more impact. The story sounds almost too good to be true. And it w...
Read more

Capitalism vs. the Three Legged Stool

Image
Wikipedia defines: " Capitalism  is an  economic system  in which trade, industry and the  means of production  are controlled by private owners with the goal of making  profits  in a  market economy ." This definition has always bothered me. I prefer a different model where there is equal recognition of the three primary drivers behind the success of a company: Owners Employees Customers I like to think of it as a three legged stool, where each leg is as important as the other.  One gets too large or small and the stool tips over. The free market is supposed to take care of Employees and Customers.  Employees because the Owners will create so many jobs that due to supply and demand, employees will receive competitive pay.  Customers because if the owners are not building the right thing, then they can go elsewhere. As someone who has helped to build about 10 startup companies now, I have seen the power in mak...
Read more

Galbraith Revisited

Image
To follow up on my post from a while ago, Galbraith sited 5 key reasons for the 1929 crash and following depression: 1. The bad distribution of income. 2. The bad corporate structure. 3. The bad banking structure. 4. The dubious state of the foreign balance. 5. The poor state of economic intelligence. To compare this to today: 1. Bad income distribution. 1929 - Top 5% received about 33% of all personal income. 1929 - Top 1% held 44% of all wealth. 2000 - Top 1% received about 20% of all personal income. 2004 - Top 1% held 34% of all wealth. Here is a picture of the real income gains between 1979 and 2005 by percentage. It is clear that the top income groups are gaining ground faster than lower income groups - creating an income distribution that approaches 1929. 2. Bad corporate structure. In the 1929 era there had been a large rise in a "vast structure of holding companies and investment trusts... In particular the dividends from the operating companies paid the interest on t...
Read more