Oracle Doesn't Get Open Source

Kohsuke Kawaguchi, the creator of the Hudson Open Source project woke up Monday morning and discovered he was no longer able to access the Source Code Repository to make commits. Oracle had decided to shut it down, as they are shutting down many projects in java.net to try to move it to their own infrastructure. Not only that, but the mailing lists were shut down as well. They said not to worry, they will have it up in a week.

No notice, no transition plan, no respect for the open source community or the project creator.

Fortunately KK knows open source better than Oracle. And KK knows how to run an open source infrastructure better.

He and others in the community moved the mailing list archive and list to Google Groups and Nabble - http://hudson-labs.org/content/mailing-lists so there is better functionality and search capability than before. He moved the source code to Git - https://github.com/hudson/hudson.

He did this all in a few hours. All completely open. Oracle is still a week away from completion… But the community is up and running!

Comments

Alexis MP said…
The migration had long been planned. So it's a bit unfair to paint this as a sudden shut down of service.

The move to the new infrastructure is complete for a good number of projects, with the other ones done in a few hours if all goes well. And we're talking full migration with roles, issues, code and mailing lists preserved
November 23, 2010 at 4:04 AM
Anonymous said…
Apparently there was a (unoticed) notice. http://hudson.361315.n4.nabble.com/Re-Subversion-credentials-not-working-td3054214.html.
November 23, 2010 at 4:40 AM
Ruurd said…
So eh yeah, what's new...
November 23, 2010 at 7:35 AM
Unknown said…
Your characterization is not in alignment with the facts. The Java.net migration plan to Kenai infrastructure has been public for almost a year and has been communicated out to project owners almost continually. See http://java.net/projects/help/pages/JavaNetMigration.

- Justin Kestelyn, Oracle Technology Network
November 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM
Bob said…
@chm and @Justin. Yes, my sentence about Oracle not giving notice was inaccurate. KK did get an email on Friday warning the services would be shut down on Sunday. Also, my sentence about no transition plan was inaccurate, apparently there was one.

I think most of the rest of what I said is fairly accurate or my opinion. More coordination with KK and Winston to communicate with the community would have been good. Also a temporary solution like the community put in place would have been a good idea rather than a shut down of those services.

I'll also note the community seems to like the availability on Git - http://groups.google.com/group/hudson-dev/browse_thread/thread/8d3cf0ca1240280a?pli=1
November 23, 2010 at 4:52 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ringside Winding Down

A year ago, a group of us met in a pizza parlor to discuss how we could bring the social web to every website and business. In January, we launched Ringside Networks with seed funding from Matrix Partners, one of the best VC firms in the country. By the end of March we released into open source an initial beta of our Social Application Server – a very ambitious project. We got some very positive reviews on our approach, our implementation and the need in the marketplace for every website to become social. We were ready for our Series A round of funding, and in late May we received a number of term sheet offers from the very best VC firms. As we were about to finalize our funding, one of the biggest non-evil Internet companies asked if we would have interest in being acquired instead. After a lot of thought and debate, we decided that the larger company would enable us to get our technology to market sooner and with more impact. The story sounds almost too good to be true. And it w...
Read more

Capitalism vs. the Three Legged Stool

Image
Wikipedia defines: " Capitalism  is an  economic system  in which trade, industry and the  means of production  are controlled by private owners with the goal of making  profits  in a  market economy ." This definition has always bothered me. I prefer a different model where there is equal recognition of the three primary drivers behind the success of a company: Owners Employees Customers I like to think of it as a three legged stool, where each leg is as important as the other.  One gets too large or small and the stool tips over. The free market is supposed to take care of Employees and Customers.  Employees because the Owners will create so many jobs that due to supply and demand, employees will receive competitive pay.  Customers because if the owners are not building the right thing, then they can go elsewhere. As someone who has helped to build about 10 startup companies now, I have seen the power in mak...
Read more

Galbraith Revisited

Image
To follow up on my post from a while ago, Galbraith sited 5 key reasons for the 1929 crash and following depression: 1. The bad distribution of income. 2. The bad corporate structure. 3. The bad banking structure. 4. The dubious state of the foreign balance. 5. The poor state of economic intelligence. To compare this to today: 1. Bad income distribution. 1929 - Top 5% received about 33% of all personal income. 1929 - Top 1% held 44% of all wealth. 2000 - Top 1% received about 20% of all personal income. 2004 - Top 1% held 34% of all wealth. Here is a picture of the real income gains between 1979 and 2005 by percentage. It is clear that the top income groups are gaining ground faster than lower income groups - creating an income distribution that approaches 1929. 2. Bad corporate structure. In the 1929 era there had been a large rise in a "vast structure of holding companies and investment trusts... In particular the dividends from the operating companies paid the interest on t...
Read more